Stablecoins are not censorship-resistant money
The guest and hosts argued that stablecoins like USDC and USDT are excellent fintech tools but should not be viewed as replacements for censorship-resistant store-of-value assets like Bitcoin and Ether.
The argument
The discussion was sparked by Circle freezing 16 hot wallets over a US federal civil court case. The hosts argued this sets a weak precedent showing that centralized stablecoin issuers can and will freeze assets without robust accountability or recourse.
The thesis, stress-tested
✓ What validates it
- ✓Increased frequency of stablecoin freezes originating from non-criminal civil court orders
▸ Risks discussed
- ▸Centralized stablecoins can be frozen due to civil disputes, not just federal criminal cases
- ▸Users lack legal recourse or transparency when issuers freeze funds
Hear it yourself
"Last story of the week, it keeps with stable coins and Circle freezing some accounts. So some criticism coming from Zach xBT To Circle, how come Circle froze the USDC balance of 16 unrelated hot wallets late yesterday for a civil case?"
00:00 / 00:15
AFFILIATE LINK · ZORTIX MAY EARN A COMMISSION · NEVER A RECOMMENDATION TO TRADE