Redemption gates trap mass affluent investors
The guest argued that the growing retailization of private credit exposes mass affluent investors to illiquidity and redemption gates, creating reputational and financial risks for asset managers.
The argument
While the Fed views private credit redemption risks as manageable due to structural gates, the shift from institutional to retail investors means many are locked into non-traded vehicles. Blue Owl Capital Corp II's decision to gate redemptions and pay out only 30% illustrates the liquidity mismatch and subsequent pressure on the manager's stock.
The thesis, stress-tested
✓ What validates it
- ✓Further gating of retail-facing BDCs
- ✓Saba Capital or other activists successfully tendering for gated BDC assets at steep discounts
▸ Risks discussed
- ▸Illiquidity of underlying private assets
- ▸Reputational damage to fund sponsors
- ▸Collateral calls on founders' pledged stock
Hear it yourself
"What do you think the Fed's seeing? Why are they saying it? What are they missing? Remeditions, isn't it, of subprime being maintained? But they know that. So they are not going to be making as bold a statement having not done the work. And I think on this occasion, what they are saying is that the amount of money ultimately that's invested in private credit on terms that limit redemptions is tiny in the context of the overall financial system. And the fact that these gates are in place, that these redemption limits are in place, it creates headline risk. It creates reputation risk for the providers, and we can talk a little bit about that."
AFFILIATE LINK · ZORTIX MAY EARN A COMMISSION · NEVER A RECOMMENDATION TO TRADE