Trade Desk faces structural growth and agency headwinds
The bear case argued for Trade Desk is that its high 20% take rate is unsustainable as key agency relationships fracture and competitors like Amazon and Google offer viable alternatives.
The argument
The speakers noted that the stock has fallen 85% from its peak due to decelerating revenue growth, friction from transitioning to its new AI platform (Kochi), and major ad agencies like Publicis, WPP, and Dentsu pushing back on its opaque fee structures.
The thesis, stress-tested
✓ What validates it
- ✓Further agency defections or fee structure audits
- ✓Stabilization or re-acceleration of revenue growth in upcoming quarters
- ✓Widespread adoption of Unified ID 2.0 (UID2) as the default connected TV standard
▸ Risks discussed
- ▸Highly concentrated customer base with two agency holding companies accounting for 30% of spend
- ▸Intense competition from walled gardens like Google, Meta, and Amazon
- ▸Decelerating revenue growth and margin pressure from platform transition friction
Hear it yourself
"And so while the Trade is denies having failed an audit of their fee structure, the dispute with publicists is really coming on the heels of a bunch of other major agencies like WPP and Dentsu ending their use of the Trade Desk open path platform over concerns about just in a really opaque fee structure."
00:00 / 00:20
AFFILIATE LINK · ZORTIX MAY EARN A COMMISSION · NEVER A RECOMMENDATION TO TRADE