High-fee 'hot sauce' ETFs reverse fee compression
The thesis argues that the long-running ETF fee war has bottomed out at around 17 basis points as issuers successfully launch high-fee, highly active, or leveraged 'hot sauce' ETFs to satisfy retail demand for speculation.
The argument
The guest argued that while core beta exposure has been commoditized to near-zero fees, investors are entirely fee-insensitive when it comes to extreme active or leveraged products. This allows issuers to generate massive revenues from single-stock leveraged ETFs (like 2x Nvidia) even with relatively small asset bases.
The thesis, stress-tested
✓ What validates it
- ✓Average asset-weighted ETF expense ratios continuing to tick upward from the 17 bps floor
- ✓Continued high volume of active and leveraged ETF launches sustaining profitability
▸ Risks discussed
- ▸High product mortality rate for niche ETFs
- ▸Extreme volatility and decay in leveraged products
Hear it yourself
"Like, the more prideful you are, like, I'm telling you, New York's You don't have the ponies, Eric. No. Oubre is annoying too. He you, he's man. He's an unlikable player. I mean, he's good. You know who I don't like? It's Josh Hart. He's always Yeah. He's always Yeah. Every play, he's got that it's like I wanna punch him so bad. Yeah. Watch it out. And I like Villanova. My dad went there. I grew up a Villanova fan. But I Josh Hart was on your team? I like Mikhail Bridges. Josh Hart was on your team, you would wait outside the building for autographs. Probably. Okay."
04:30
AFFILIATE LINK · ZORTIX MAY EARN A COMMISSION · NEVER A RECOMMENDATION TO TRADE