Flawed capital rules incentivize risky bank-funded private credit
The guest argued that flawed risk-based capital rules allow banks to use regulatory arbitrage to fund highly risky private credit loans indirectly with favorable capital treatment.
The argument
Bair explained that banks receive more favorable capital charges when lending to overcollateralized private credit funds than when lending directly to businesses. This structure permits banks to indirectly fund risky loans that would otherwise violate prudent underwriting standards, creating hidden risks in the financial system.
The thesis, stress-tested
✓ What validates it
- ✓An increase in default rates among private credit portfolio companies
- ✓Regulatory changes tightening risk-based capital rules for fund-level bank lending
▸ Risks discussed
- ▸Lack of transparency in private credit loan valuations
- ▸Potential conflicts of interest with affiliated private equity funds
- ▸Proposed capital rules may further incentivize this indirect lending
Hear it yourself
"end of two thousand nine when the rest of the country was reeling in a recession. No. I think we could have been a lot tougher. So but, you know, these things are all compromises. And, actually, it was more with Tim Geithner than Hank Poulsen. Hank and I could usually come to a common ground, and we did on issues where we started with different different viewpoints. But, yeah, I mean, I think there is a perception of some that they were kinda the Wall Street was the center of the universe and the heartthrob of the economy, and we needed to take gender loving care with it and all of that."
AFFILIATE LINK · ZORTIX MAY EARN A COMMISSION · NEVER A RECOMMENDATION TO TRADE