Zortix
Sign in
ConceptAMZNExplored · 3/5Save idea

Blind contrarianism fails in a disruptive economy

The guest argued that being a contrarian is no longer sufficient for value investing because technological disruption causes failing business models to collapse faster than in the past.

The argument

In Ben Graham's era, cheap companies often recovered because downturns were purely cyclical. Today, technological disruption means cheap companies are frequently 'melting ice cubes' under secular attack from competitors like Amazon, requiring deep qualitative judgment alongside a contrarian instinct.

Hear it yourself
"Our guest today is not only one of the most successful and visible practitioners of value investing, he's also made major contributions to the field through his writing and commentary, including directly to the Columbia Business School community."
00:00 / 00:15
AFFILIATE LINK · ZORTIX MAY EARN A COMMISSION · NEVER A RECOMMENDATION TO TRADE
NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE · A SUMMARY OF WHAT WAS SAID ON THE PODCAST · VERIFY AGAINST THE SOURCE
AMZN: Blind contrarianism fails in a disruptive economy · Zortix