Homes.com expansion faces execution and competition risks
The bear case for CoStar Group's consumer expansion is that replicating the apartments.com playbook with homes.com is proving significantly more difficult and is currently dragging down financial performance.
The argument
The speakers noted that homes.com is underperforming internal and Wall Street targets. Unlike apartments.com, homes.com lacks a strong foundation of organic traffic and faces intense competition from entrenched players like Zillow, making the consumer residential push a highly speculative and expensive endeavor.
The thesis, stress-tested
✓ What validates it
- ✓Homes.com missing revised traffic or revenue targets in upcoming quarters
- ✓Continued margin compression in CoStar's consolidated financial results
▸ Risks discussed
- ▸Chasing a strategy that worked in rentals but may not translate to residential sales
- ▸Sustained high marketing and sales spend dragging down consolidated corporate margins
- ▸Intense litigation and retaliatory actions from incumbent competitors like Zillow
Hear it yourself
"And you could argue that apartments.com took a bit of time to get spinning too, but homes.com seems to be underperforming pretty much all of the targets they've set for it, even internally, not just Wall Street analysts, but also internal targets."
00:00 / 00:14
AFFILIATE LINK · ZORTIX MAY EARN A COMMISSION · NEVER A RECOMMENDATION TO TRADE