Off-balance-sheet shift drives higher bank multiples
The speaker argued that shifting risk-taking from a bank's own balance sheet to off-balance-sheet investment vehicles reduces earnings volatility, resulting in a higher price-to-earnings multiple and return on equity.
The argument
While on-balance-sheet investing yields higher nominal dollars per trade, transitioning to an asset-management model provides smoother earnings that public markets reward with higher valuations. The speaker noted this transition was critical for maintaining a risk-taking culture at Goldman Sachs post-IPO while satisfying public shareholders' preference for predictable earnings.
The thesis, stress-tested
✓ What validates it
- ✓Expansion of asset management fee margins in subsequent quarterly reports
- ✓P/E multiple expansion relative to peers with higher balance-sheet risk exposure
▸ Risks discussed
- ▸Lower absolute dollar earnings from fee-based structures compared to successful principal investing
- ▸Potential loss of top investing talent who prefer to run independent funds with higher carry
Hear it yourself
"And I think twice was to the Radio City Music Hall Christmas show. Yep. And I know once of them was an interview to go to Harvard. Mhmm. And that was a big deal. We might as well have been 5,000 miles away from it because I grew up in public housing. It was this won't mean anything to you. It was a two fair zone. You had to take a bus to the subway to get to the city. It probably took a long time to get there. I grew up in public housing, NYCHA Mhmm. Where I think there's a gradation of incomes that you can have. There's different levels of public housing, and I think if you made more than $90 a week, you couldn't live in that particular building."
AFFILIATE LINK · ZORTIX MAY EARN A COMMISSION · NEVER A RECOMMENDATION TO TRADE