MGM Resorts offers capped downside and catalysts
The bull case for MGM Resorts highlights a strong valuation floor established by a Barry Diller bid, alongside significant growth catalysts in Japan, Dubai, and upgraded domestic property monetization.
The argument
The speakers argued that MGM's downside is highly protected by the existing bid, while its upside could reach three times its current value within two years. Furthermore, upgrading entertainment offerings at Las Vegas properties is expected to drive substantial incremental gambling revenue, as demonstrated by high-draw venues like the Sphere.
The thesis, stress-tested
✓ What validates it
- ✓Barry Diller actively restructuring or upgrading entertainment offerings at MGM properties
- ✓Progress on development or licensing in Japan and Dubai
▸ Risks discussed
- ▸Rejection of the Barry Diller bid without alternative catalysts materializing
- ▸General macroeconomic downturns affecting consumer discretionary spending on gambling
Hear it yourself
"Barry now owns 26% of the company. Now I put this presentation together two weeks ago. Yesterday, he actually bid for the company. Okay? So when I put the presentation together, the stock was about $37. It's now high forties. He bid $48. Okay? I would not sell my shares to him. When did we get this presentation? Did we get it early enough to transfer? I would not sell his I would not sell my stock to him for a second. And the reason is also besides him buying the stock, the company's also been buying the stock. Rarely have I ever seen a company in six years buy half their float back."
AFFILIATE LINK · ZORTIX MAY EARN A COMMISSION · NEVER A RECOMMENDATION TO TRADE