Fairfax favored over Markel in casualty insurance
The guest argued that Fairfax Financial is currently a more attractive business than Markel due to underwriting challenges in the casualty reinsurance market.
The argument
The guest noted that casualty books written between 2015 and 2020 are facing reserve adequacy questions due to higher-than-expected loss cost inflation, which has made Markel's insurance operations more difficult to underwrite compared to Fairfax.
The thesis, stress-tested
✓ What validates it
- ✓Markel reporting further reserve strengthening or adverse development in its casualty lines
- ✓Fairfax demonstrating continued underwriting outperformance in quarterly reports
▸ Risks discussed
- ▸Loss cost inflation (litigation and healthcare costs) continuing to rise
- ▸Valuation for Fairfax already reflecting its recent strong performance
Hear it yourself
"Like, the casualty insurance or casualty reinsurance has been a tough business the last few years. I think there's, you know, universal questioning about reserves and casualty books from 2015 to 2020, I think are the years that it looks like business is underpriced."
00:00 / 00:18
AFFILIATE LINK · ZORTIX MAY EARN A COMMISSION · NEVER A RECOMMENDATION TO TRADE