Kinsale Capital dominates E&S insurance via in-house underwriting
The bull case argued for Kinsale Capital is that keeping its underwriting entirely in-house allows it to avoid the principal-agent misalignment of outsourced MGAs and maintain industry-leading profitability.
The argument
The speakers argued that competitors outsourcing to MGAs face misaligned incentives because MGAs are paid on premium volume rather than long-term underwriting profitability. Kinsale's in-house underwriters are instead incentivized to prioritize underwriting profit first and growth second.
The thesis, stress-tested
✓ What validates it
- ✓Combined ratio consistently sustained below 80%
- ✓Continued market share gains in the E&S segment above the current 2% level
▸ Risks discussed
- ▸Inherent uncertainty in reserving for long-tail insurance claims
- ▸Customers shopping purely on price in a commoditized industry
Hear it yourself
"Kinsale's in house underwriters are incentivized first to underwrite for a profit and second to grow the business. So at the end of the day, Kinsale lives or dies based on how well they underwrite in this market."
00:00 / 00:15
AFFILIATE LINK · ZORTIX MAY EARN A COMMISSION · NEVER A RECOMMENDATION TO TRADE