Permanent capital enables superior long-term investing
The host argued that managers with permanent capital can ignore short-term market fluctuations and exploit market mispricings, whereas non-permanent capital managers are forced to respond to redemptions.
The argument
The discussion contrasted the constraints of non-permanent capital (funds subject to client redemptions) with permanent capital (individual cash or holding companies like Berkshire Hathaway). Non-permanent capital managers are often forced to sell assets that have decreased in price but not in intrinsic value, while permanent capital managers can hold or buy more.
The thesis, stress-tested
✓ What validates it
- —
▸ Risks discussed
- ▸Requires strict personal discipline to avoid using margin
- ▸Requires the investor to be correct on the underlying intrinsic value of the asset
Hear it yourself
"In that sense, you don't have to worry about being forced to sell positions. Matthew (zero fifty seven:thirty seven): Managers of non permanent capital are often required to respond to market beliefs rather than reality."
00:00 / 00:11
AFFILIATE LINK · ZORTIX MAY EARN A COMMISSION · NEVER A RECOMMENDATION TO TRADE