Passive market share approaching dangerous systemic limit
The bear case argued is that if passive market share of the stock market exceeds 65%, the lack of discretionary active capital will trigger a systemic volatility event.
The argument
The guest argued that passive investing currently represents 53% to 54% of the market and is growing at roughly 4% annually. Once it crosses the 65% threshold, there will not be enough active discretionary capital to offset systematic volatility signatures, creating a high-probability market-wide disruption similar to the 2018 Volmageddon event.
The thesis, stress-tested
✓ What validates it
- ✓Passive market share of US equities officially crosses the 60% threshold
- ✓An increase in sudden, unexplained intraday liquidity drains and volatility spikes
▸ Risks discussed
- ▸The timeline is stochastic and the systemic event could take longer than the projected two to four years to materialize
- ▸Demographic shifts or employment changes could alter passive flow trajectories
Hear it yourself
"Last time we talked, I think you had actually done, recently released a white paper that was showing, that you've sort of proven a correlative factor, that the passive flow actually passive flows actually really do, you know, the the data validates your your theory that you've been out there begging for a long time. So anyways, any advances on the research side of things, and just where are they right now? What's the state? Are they still rising? I mean, they must be because we're at all time highs in the stock market the day we're talking. Well, a combination of retirement flows and some driven by rebalancing as well as"
AFFILIATE LINK · ZORTIX MAY EARN A COMMISSION · NEVER A RECOMMENDATION TO TRADE