Zortix
Ask Zortix…⌘KSign in
BRK.BBALANCED

Berkshire fallacy: a receiver, not payer

The host argued that using Berkshire Hathaway's lack of a dividend as a counter-argument is flawed because Berkshire is a holding company that receives massive dividends from its operating subsidiaries.

Keep reading this one

You've read the thesis and who argued it. A free account opens the argument, what validates it, the risks the show raised, and the moment in the episode where it was said — 3 ideas in full a day, no card.

Something wrong with this record?

Sign in to flag a problem with this record — corrections go to human review, never to a public thread.

NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE · A SUMMARY OF WHAT WAS SAID ON THE PODCAST · VERIFY AGAINST THE SOURCE