Large US banks are fully valuedRevived after 26 quiet weeks.
ThenThe case made was that large US banks like JPMorgan are great businesses but are not good values at current multiples, trading at a premium to smaller banks due to passive flows and perceived stability.NowThe bull case argued for banks: they will see efficiencies from AI, credit quality is good, and consumer spending remains strong.What finance podcasts are saying aboutJPMorgan Chase & Co.JPMNYSE
According to Zortix's podcast index, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) was discussed on 6 finance podcasts across 8 episodes in the 30 days to 11 Sep 2026, generating 8 attributed ideas — most coverage from CNBC Fast Money, The Pomp Podcast and Eurodollar University.
- Mentions · 7d
- 1
- Mentions · 30d
- 8
- Mentions · 90d
- 31
- Episodes · 30d
- 8
- Shows · 30d
- 6
- Vs prior week
- -1
- Discussion depth
- In-depth coverage
As of 7 Sept 2026
Ask Zortix about JPMKey facts
- Exchange
- NYSE
- Sector
- Banks & financials
- Industry
- National Commercial Banks
- Headquarters
- New York, NY
- Incorporated in
- Delaware
- Fiscal year ends
- 31 December
- Formerly
- Chase Manhattan Corp /De/
Listing and registration facts from public registries · SEC EDGAR filings for JPM. Not a rating, forecast or recommendation.
Stance mix · podcast discussion
4 BULLISH · 1 BALANCED · 3 BEARISH
15 JUNWEEKLY · 90D7 SEP
Counts of attributed podcast discussion · not a rating, forecast, or recommendation
Top shows by coverage · 30 days
| Show | Ideas | Episodes |
|---|---|---|
| CNBC Fast Money | 2 | 2 |
| The Pomp Podcast | 2 | 2 |
| Eurodollar University | 1 | 1 |
| Monetary Matters with Jack Farley | 1 | 1 |
| Thoughtful Money | 1 | 1 |
Latest ideas · headlines, attributed
7 SEP4D AGOEURODOLLAR UNIVERSITY · EURODOLLAR TALK
3 SEP1W AGOMONETARY MATTERS WITH JACK FARLEY · INSANELY BULLISH
2 SEP1W AGOCNBC FAST MONEY · VENEZUELA
The Callback on JPM
What they said then, and what they are saying now.
Definitions
- Mention
- One attributed idea naming this ticker, extracted from a podcast episode and dated by the episode’s air date. How we count →
- Attributed idea
- A specific argument a named speaker made on a named show — never an aggregate opinion, never Zortix’s view. What qualifies →
- Discussion depth
- How thoroughly an idea was argued on the episode, from a brief mention to a core thesis — a description of the conversation, not a rating of the stock. The bands →
- Stance mix
- Counts of attributed ideas by the side each argued on this name — bullish, balanced, or bearish as the speaker put it. A tally of the conversation’s sides, never a combined score, a rating, or Zortix’s view.