Large US banks are fully valuedRevived after 26 quiet weeks.
ThenThe case made was that large US banks like JPMorgan are great businesses but are not good values at current multiples, trading at a premium to smaller banks due to passive flows and perceived stability.NowThe bull case argued for banks: they will see efficiencies from AI, credit quality is good, and consumer spending remains strong.What finance podcasts are saying aboutMorgan StanleyMSNYSE
According to Zortix's podcast index, Morgan Stanley (MS) was discussed on 1 finance podcast across 1 episode in the 30 days to 11 Sep 2026, generating 1 attributed idea — most coverage from Monetary Matters with Jack Farley.
- Mentions · 7d
- 0
- Mentions · 30d
- 1
- Mentions · 90d
- 9
- Episodes · 30d
- 1
- Shows · 30d
- 1
- Vs prior week
- -1
- Discussion depth
- In-depth coverage
As of 3 Sept 2026
Ask Zortix about MSKey facts
- Exchange
- NYSE
- Sector
- Banks & financials
- Industry
- Security Brokers, Dealers & Flotation Companies
- Headquarters
- New York, NY
- Incorporated in
- Delaware
- Fiscal year ends
- 31 December
- Formerly
- Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co
Listing and registration facts from public registries · SEC EDGAR filings for MS. Not a rating, forecast or recommendation.
Stance mix · podcast discussion
0 BULLISH · 0 BALANCED · 1 BEARISH
22 JUNWEEKLY · 90D31 AUG
Counts of attributed podcast discussion · not a rating, forecast, or recommendation
Top shows by coverage · 30 days
| Show | Ideas | Episodes |
|---|---|---|
| Monetary Matters with Jack Farley | 1 | 1 |
Latest ideas · headlines, attributed
3 SEP1W AGOMONETARY MATTERS WITH JACK FARLEY · INSANELY BULLISH
15 JUL15 JULWSJ WHAT'S NEWS
14 JUL14 JULTHE COMPOUND AND FRIENDS
Open in Zortix →Thesis and listen link in the app
The Callback on MS
What they said then, and what they are saying now.
Definitions
- Mention
- One attributed idea naming this ticker, extracted from a podcast episode and dated by the episode’s air date. How we count →
- Attributed idea
- A specific argument a named speaker made on a named show — never an aggregate opinion, never Zortix’s view. What qualifies →
- Discussion depth
- How thoroughly an idea was argued on the episode, from a brief mention to a core thesis — a description of the conversation, not a rating of the stock. The bands →
- Stance mix
- Counts of attributed ideas by the side each argued on this name — bullish, balanced, or bearish as the speaker put it. A tally of the conversation’s sides, never a combined score, a rating, or Zortix’s view.