Zortix
Ask Zortix…⌘KSign in
SPYBULLISHFLIPPEDEXCESS RETURNS · BEARISH IN AUGUST → BULLISH IN AUGUST

Midterm election volatility underpriced

Kevin Muir argued that implied volatility for the S&P 500 around the midterm elections is significantly underpriced, especially given the unique political risks of this cycle.

EXCESS RETURNS CHANGED ITS VIEW

BEARISH FOR 2 WEEKS, THEN THE TURN
THEN14 AUG · BEARISHThe argument was that past increases in oil prices, bond yields, and the dollar have a lagged tightening effect, which will pressure the S&P 500 and the economy later this year.NOW31 AUG · BULLISHKevin Muir argued that implied volatility for the S&P 500 around the midterm elections is significantly underpriced, especially given the unique political risks of this cycle.

Keep reading this one

You've read the thesis and who argued it. A free account opens the argument, what validates it, the risks the show raised, and the moment in the episode where it was said — 3 ideas in full a day, no card.

The Callback

Integrated risk: correlation, single-stock vol, and cheap insurance

25 weeks between these two statements.

Then

The guest argued that policy, particularly surrounding midterm elections, is the paramount driver of markets and a significant source of uncertainty that is not being priced into volatility.

MASTERS IN BUSINESS · 6 MAR 2026 · 05:15Open in Zortix →
Now

Kevin Muir argued that implied volatility for the S&P 500 around the midterm elections is significantly underpriced, especially given the unique political risks of this cycle.

EXCESS RETURNS · 31 AUG 2026 · 2W AGO · 10:30
Something wrong with this record?

Sign in to flag a problem with this record — corrections go to human review, never to a public thread.

NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE · A SUMMARY OF WHAT WAS SAID ON THE PODCAST · VERIFY AGAINST THE SOURCE